State Rep. Wendell Craig Williams | Pennsylvania 160th Legislative District
State Rep. Wendell Craig Williams | Pennsylvania 160th Legislative District
Impeachment managers in Pennsylvania are set to file an appeal with the state's Supreme Court, challenging a decision by the Commonwealth Court regarding Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner. State Representatives Craig Williams and Tim Bonner announced their intent to pursue an impeachment trial against Krasner for alleged misbehavior in office.
Williams stated, "We will pursue the impeachment trial for Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner for misbehavior in public office, as outlined in the Articles of Impeachment passed by the Pennsylvania House in November 2022." He further explained that certain instances of misuse of power were not addressed by the Commonwealth Court and raised questions about whether some articles of impeachment were constitutionally valid.
The Senate had previously set a trial date for January 18, 2023. However, Krasner objected to the proceedings on three grounds, with the court only accepting one: that the articles did not describe conduct meeting the standard for impeachment under Article VI, Section 6 of the Constitution.
Bonner emphasized their position: "Our position is that the House of Representatives and the State Senate have sole authority according to the Constitution to determine what constitutes misbehavior in office." He also noted that they believe evidence proving improper or corrupt intent was not fully considered by the court.
Three specific articles allege Krasner performed duties with improper motives, abusing his power. The Commonwealth Court ruled these could not be considered due to alleged violations of ethics rules. However, Williams and Bonner argue they can prove misconduct without relying on those rules.
A key example cited is Krasner's handling of a case involving Officer Ryan Pownall. They claim his actions showed an "improper or corrupt motive," including using a grand jury process improperly and concealing exculpatory evidence. Williams remarked on this behavior as unprecedented misconduct from someone representing public safety interests.
The appeal aims to ensure that it is within legislative powers to define what constitutes misbehavior in office. Bonner concluded, "We are taking this appeal because we are firmly convinced separation of powers dictates...what facts constitute misbehavior in office."